Skip to content
72 Networks

Field notes · Delivery

What forty AI inventories taught us about shadow AI

Short, specific observations from building AI system registers inside mid-market companies.

Author
Rohan Iyer, Engagement Lead, Delivery
Published
4 August 2026
Reading time
5 min read

What organisations declare, and what we find

The declared number is usually three or four. The found number is usually between twenty and forty. The gap is not deceit. It is definition. Most organisations count the systems they bought on purpose. Almost none count the AI that arrived inside something else.

The four categories that keep appearing

Departmental SaaS with embedded AI: the HR tool that started scoring résumés in a March release note nobody read. Browser extensions: summarisers and writing assistants with access to everything on the screen. Personal LLM accounts used on company data, invariably by your most productive people, which is why bans fail. And vendor systems with model components the vendor never disclosed, because the contract never asked.

Why “we didn't know” is not a position

Under DPDP, fiduciary duty does not accept ignorance of where personal data goes. Under SEBI 16C, responsibility does not accept it either. The inventory is not the compliance exercise; it is the precondition for every other control you will ever be asked about.

What a usable register looks like

One page per system, seven fields: name, owner, data touched, vendor, model components, decision impact, last reviewed. If your register needs a workflow tool and a steering committee, it will be accurate for one quarter and fictional by the third.

Sources

  1. 72 Networks delivery records: 40 AI system inventories, 2025-26
  2. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023